v1.3.83

This is a minor update released early to block multiple silent weapon hacks that has been affecting the community. We are also trialling the public announcement of all bans and deathmatch warnings as a deterrent to server players.

Revision 1.3.83
- Added another layer of protection for weapon hacks
- We are trialling public announcements for all bans and deathmatch warnings
- Adjusted fisher job detection
- Adjusted all teleport detections

 

[Cinqo]

Nice


10char

 

[RayMaurice]

great

10char

 

[SeanWazowski]

Glad to hear....

 

[Alfred Wrzosek³]

Finally............

 

[Dante]

Well done

 

[Aguila]

Now that's an update ! Thanks Barney ser.

 

[Vincent1]

neither deathmatch warnings or all bans should be public.

u wanna start having threads "Who is Best DMers in Lawles ?" go ahead and make dm warnings public. Pictures will flood the forums with "XXXX was DM warned by XXX". People will attempt to become famous by showing off how many times they've been dm warned.

Showing the entire online playerbase when someone breaks a rule is giving the perpetrator a sense of entitlement, due to everyone online knowing they got dm warned. Keeping it with only the admin, and rulebreaker being aware that a dm warned was issued will be a much better system. The person is more than welcome to tell everyone they got dm warned, no need to announce it to the whole server and have people spam on /g "Lol Rip Faget nigER Idiot DMer !"

bans should only be public if they involve a player who isnt just some russian troll using warp hacks/troll hacks. If a level 15 is banned for aimbot, sure make it public.

You'd rather not show the community how many random hackers get autobanned for weapon hacking/speed hacking or anything detected by the server. As well as random lvl 1 warpers/trolls etc. Gives the server a bad image(even tho every server deals with these types of people).

 

[Shane Platinum]

better one and thank you for posting this.

 

[Androa]

neither deathmatch warnings or all bans should be public.

u wanna start having threads "Who is Best DMers in Lawles ?" go ahead and make dm warnings public. Pictures will flood the forums with "XXXX was DM warned by XXX". People will attempt to become famous by showing off how many times they've been dm warned.

Showing the entire online playerbase when someone breaks a rule is giving the perpetrator a sense of entitlement, due to everyone online knowing they got dm warned. Keeping it with only the admin, and rulebreaker being aware that a dm warned was issued will be a much better system. The person is more than welcome to tell everyone they got dm warned, no need to announce it to the whole server and have people spam on /g "Lol Rip Faget nigER Idiot DMer !"

bans should only be public if they involve a player who isnt just some russian troll using warp hacks/troll hacks. If a level 15 is banned for aimbot, sure make it public.

You'd rather not show the community how many random hackers get autobanned for weapon hacking/speed hacking or anything detected by the server. As well as random lvl 1 warpers/trolls etc. Gives the server a bad image(even tho every server deals with these types of people).

In my opinion thats not something to be proud of or to showcase, not sure who'd do something like that but I am pretty sure staff won't allow that. On the other hand, displaying punishments public is part of being transparent. We have to be honest and open to the public and players and not do the things behind closed curtains as it can raise suspicion. Also, showing them will also let our players know that we are actively fighting the rule breakers and that we are trying to create a better place for those who are playing fair and are trying to have fun.